Skip to content
dls insights

The U.S. and Short Sea Shipping

Image courtesy of the MARAD website: www.maritime.dot.gov

“Virtues are lost in self-interest as rivers are lost in the sea”

Francoise de La Rochefoucauld, 1613-1680

Ships, on a cost-per-ton mile, are the most efficient way to move large quantities of material, raw or finished. But ships are useless unless they have somewhere to load and unload cargo.

In the name of efficiency, economies of scale have taken over many sectors of the marine industry. Larger ships, with no increase in the size of the crew, have decreased the per unit cost of cargo being shipped. From planning to delivery, a new ship can be put in service in two to four years.

The catch is that while the great new state-of-the-art ship is ready, the rest of the world’s goods distribution system may not be.

With the goal of the IMO and individual countries trying to reach Green House Gas (GHG) reduction goals by 2030 and 2050, ships with 20-year economic lives are being built now to operate on fuels of the future. This extra investment is an expensive gamble by vessel owners and operators.

The near future is about LNG, and LNG refueling infrastructure is being built at major ports throughout the world. But LNG, as it is currently being produced, is not the needed clean fuel. The future lies with green methanol, green ammonia, fuel cells and renewable electric power. These green fuels will have to be produced via renewable power such as wind, solar or even hydropower. This will take more years of study, testing, and then production. But will these fuels be available where they are needed?

The problem is port and inland infrastructure. While the 22,000+ TEU container ship is the height of efficiency there are a limited number of ports in the world that can receive these ships. It is not only that they need multiple new generation container cranes that can reach 22 to 24 rows of containers, such as is the arrangement on the largest container ships, but the entire port must fit the capacity of the crane(s) as well as the ships that bring the containers.

To receive the largest container ships, port facilities must have a water depth (preferably at Mean Low Water-MLW) above 51 feet. Post-Panama and Neo-Panamax ships of 6000 to 8000 TEU require water depths of 45’ to 50’. These ports also need multiple ship berths, from 800’ to 1000’ in length that can fit and hold such ships alongside. In addition, the berths must be strong enough to support several Super Post-Panamax container gantry cranes. These cranes can weigh over 1600 metric tonnes each and require additional electrical power to operate.

All this only gets a container off the ship and on to the dock. The more containers that are dropped in a port by a single ship the more container volume that must be moved within and in and out of the port. This calls for tractors and flatbed trailers, gantry cranes, both rail and rubber tired, straddle carriers, forklift stackers, and automation equipment. Plus, truck and rail transportation to move the containers from the port to their destinations.

Designing and building modern container ships can take two to three years. A permit for dredging or a bond issue for funds for port expansion can take two to four years before any actual work gets started. Expanding a container facility with additional land can take up to 10 years. While a ship can be sold off around the world, if a port doesn’t attract the business it needs to pay off its expansion debt, a governmental entity may be forced take at least part of the financial hit.

While ship funding can be risky, marine infrastructure funding may even be a tougher call. On top of port capacity, tomorrow’s most desirable ports will also have to have fueling capacity for vessels of all types running on LNG, ammonia, methanol, and other fuels that will become more common in the next decade.

The future seems to suggest a cap on container ship growth in the range of 24,000 TEU’s and this only for a restricted number of ships for the Asia-Europe trade where there are ports and some infrastructure (Europe’s existing inland and coastal short sea shipping distribution system) which can handle the load. Most of the rest of the world will be living with variations of a hub-and-spoke system with 8000-12000 TEU ships calling at select ports while feeder ships of smaller capacity, and inland transportation, completing the distribution of the containers.

In the United States part of the move to assist waterborne distribution of cargo is the America’s Marine Highway System (AMHS). In Europe 40% of cargo is distributed by water. In the US, only 6% is moved by water while 75% is via truck. Admittedly, this is because much of the US is not economically accessible via water while much of Europe has an infrastructure of navigable rivers, locks, and canals.

The AMHS was set up by Section 1121 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. Its purpose was to reduce fuel consumption and road congestion by facilitating more tons-per-cargo-mile efficient barge and ship movements. This use of more marine assets would also support US long term security plans by maintaining a Jones Act fleet and necessary shipyards. While originally meant for container movements, Section 405 of the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2012 opened support for movements of some break bulk cargo, like project cargo, and roll-on/roll-off including ferries.

While somewhat originally limited to the U.S. East Coast and inland rivers, it has since been expanded to cover 26 routes which includes all four of the US coasts plus non-contiguous areas like Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and Guam.

AMHS isn’t cheap and isn’t entirely successful. Container movements via tug-barge between Baton Rouge/New Orleans and Norfolk/Richmond are proving to be successful. DLS Marine’s Norfolk office provides marine survey services for many tugs on the Norfolk/Richmond route. Other container routes are improving as increases in efficiency and efficiency of scale bring down direct costs. However, studies have shown that the indirect costs of truck wear on infrastructure roads and bridges along with fuel cost and pollution make the AMHS a long-term money saver.

Altering historic transportation routes is not easy. The Railroad and trucking industries have powerful well-funded lobbies and tariff manipulation is not unknown. The rail and barge industry had tariff wars in the days of coal delivery to coal fired power plants. On top of that, the Harbor Maintenance Fee (HMF) levees a fee on each container move in each port. If a container is moved from a ship to a barge in one port then moved to a second port and unloaded there, the HMF is paid twice, increasing the cost of transportation.

As an aside, you will note that it is a fee and not a tax. The harbor fund has billions of dollars in it as Congress has loved collecting it but not spending it as the surplus makes the “books” look better. While it may be unreasonable to “tax” a container twice, someone else pays it and the government benefits. Marginal benefits trickle down to the ports themselves as the fund pays for dredging up to 50 feet. But dredging over 50 feet, the port must pay half of the additional cost for the additional depth. And as noted above, the largest container ships need more than 50 feet.

While the government wants the benefits of AMHS, it doesn’t want to give up the benefits of HMF which would make the financial end of the American Marine Highway System more palatable.

As part of the 2012 Act, the Maritime Administration (MARAD) was requested to design an ATB container barge. The only outcome we have found was a conceptual design from the Ocean Tug & Barge Engineering Corporation apparently done for the Maine Port Authority and McAllister Towing & Transportation Company. The tug is a standard design at 139’ with possibly 6000 hp from three EMD dual fuel engines. The proposed barge would be an open hopper design with a length of 507’ and a capacity of 894 TEU. Several sections will have adjustable fittings for 48’ and 53’ containers and the barge will have machinery flats to support reefer containers. We haven’t been able to find out if any work on this design has gone forward.

Speaking of Dual Fuel

A Norwegian company that is already involved with LNG fueled vessels has announced that it will convert one of its existing OSVs to green ammonia. This with the participation of Wartsila and EU funding. The Europeans are further along in research and development on new fuels due to the active financial support of the EU and individual countries. These experiments must be pushed along if the industry is going to meet the IMO and EU pollution reduction deadlines.

While the bright light is on designing engines to run on the fuels of the near future, and to provide on shore and onboard delivery systems for the fuels, the engine lube oil manufacturers have no idea what products they will have to produce. Their R&D has to be done hand in hand with the R&D of fuel and engine companies to see the long-term effect of each fuel on the properties of the lube oils in each engine design.

Compliance with IMO regulations on emissions, ballast water, and biofouling has created a cost domino effect for operators and charterers. For now, the replacement cost of a compliant vessel will be the benchmark for its value as the acceptance and desirability for various green designs has not been shown in the marketplace. In the future, the right guesses on compliance may be the ones that create the market benchmarks and the wrong guesses the unwanted stranded asset.

The DLS Marine team of ASA certified marine appraisers, through our long relationships with owners, lenders, shipyards, and designers, will closely follow these unprecedented changes in the marine industry, domestically and worldwide. Through these close ties we will continue to provide accuracy on the technical and valuation sides for our customers.

-Norman Laskay

If you’d like to keep this conversation going, please email me at nlaskay@DLSmarine.com

Photo of Rhine River traffic taken by Norm Laskay

Follow Us for more like this:

Additional articles

White Oil

The growth of lithium for use in batteries is phenomenal, as the number of products using lithium-based batteries grows in addition to the size of these batteries.

Read More »
Green Ships DLS Marine Survey & Appraisal

Do Green Ships Have a Nuclear Future?

The amount of money being put into meeting the 2050 air cleanliness goals of the Paris Accords and the IMO is staggering. Every week we read more news items and long reports on studies and research and experiments on new technology.

Read More »
Off Shore Wind Farm DLS Marine Appraisal and Valuation

So, What About Offshore Wind Farms?

We are headlong into the new world of wind power. Not so new if you consider that Hero of Alexandria (20 AD-70 AD) invented a windmill that pumped a bellows attached to a pipe organ. (And he invented the first vending machine – it dispensed holy water). The first windmill to provide electricity was built in 1887 by a Scottish inventor, James Blyth, to power his home.

Read More »

Get A Quote

The Fastest Way To Get Your Project Started

DLS Marine Valuation Logo
Matt McDaniel DLS Marine Survey and Appraisal

Matt McDaniel

Hull & Machinery Surveyor

Areas of Expertise:

  • Hull and Machinery
  • Damage Assessment and Repairs
  • Condition
  • Inspections
  • Project Management

Memberships / Professional Certification:

  • NAMS-CMS

Background:

Matt began marine surveying in 2014 and has experience with damage causation, reviewing transit plans, new construction, cargo transfers, salvage operations, on/off charters, and general condition surveys. He joined the Hull & Machinery department at DLS in 2019.

mmcdaniel@dlsmarine.com
Jessie Page DLS Marine Survey and Appraisal

Jessie Page

Hull & Machinery Surveyor

Areas of Expertise:

  • Hull and Machinery
  • Diesel Technician
  • Marine Repair and Fabrication
  • Engine Causation Analysis
  • Equipment Damage
  • Vessel Conditions and Safety

Professional Certifications:

  • NAMS-CMS

Certified Specialist in Caterpillar diesel engines to include:

  • Small Engine Fuel Systems
  • Medium Engine Fuel Systems
  • Engine Diagnostics
  • Electronic Sensors and Control Logics
  • Electric and Electronic Troubleshooting
  • 3500 A/B/C Diesel Engine Master Mechanic I MUI/MEUI

Background:

Jessie joined DLS in 2021 with extensive experience in the marine industry. Jessie began his career as a shipfitter, machinist, and propulsion machinery installer at a shipyard. He then spent ten years as a diesel technician doing everything from routine mechanical repairs to complete engine overhauls and dynamometer testing. Jessie specializes in engine failure analysis and recognizing improper maintenance and installation. He is able to make recommendations regarding failure causation and potential imminent failures. Jessie transitioned to marine surveying in 2016 and is now a part of the DLS Hull & Machinery department.

jpage@dlsmarine.com

Ave P. Boudreaux

Marine Surveyor

Areas of Expertise:

  • Hull and Machinery
  • Project Management Supervisor (QC) – overseen numerous construction and delivery schedules for vessels
  • Extensive knowledge of U.S. Coast Guard and ABS rules and regulations for vessel construction and repair

Education:

  • Rolls-Royce Z-Drive Failure Analysis Seminar
  • Flex-Core and Aluminum Welding Course
  • Extensive training in engine, gear, and shaft alignment
  • Extensive training in vessel repair and new construction

Memberships / Professional Certification:

  • NAMS-CMS

Background:

Mr. Boudreaux has 15 years experience with offshore supply vessels, crewboats, and anchor handling tugs. During this time, he served 8 years in vessel repair and new construction, 3 years in vessel operation and logistics, and 4 years as a vessel port captain.

Mr. Boudreaux served over 3 years as a marine surveyor performing numerous types of surveys in the marine industry prior to joining DLS.

 aboudreaux@dlsmarine.com

Norm Laskay - DLS Marine Valuation

Norman F. Laskay

Of Counsel

Mr. Laskay joined Stickney, Dufour & Associates, Inc. in 1988 as a partner. He is now of Counsel. He became a Marine Surveyor in 1974, having gained prior experience in steamship agency, bulk cargo handling and vessel operations. He has been involved in many aspects of marine surveying including hull, machinery and cargo, both inland and ocean. Since becoming an Accredited Senior Appraiser of commercial marine equipment, he has been active with the American Society of Appraisers’ International Machinery and Technical Specialties Committee. He has written a comprehensive exam for the Commercial Marine Appraisal specialty and has written a 30-hour course for the American Society of Appraisers on appraising commercial marine vessels and yachts and is the lead instructor.

Areas of Expertise:

  • Commercial Marine Appraisal
  • Hull Damage and Repair
  • Cargo Loading, Securing and Trip in Tow Preparation

Education:

  • Maine Maritime Academy Graduate
    B.S. in Marine Transportation
  • Continuing education credits in Law, Appraisal, Marine Survey, and Diesel Repair.

Professional Certification/Memberships:

  • NAMS Regional Board of Directors Member 1989-1994
  • American Society of Appraisers – Chapter Treasurer 1991-1994
  • American Society of Appraisers – Chapter President 1994-1995
  • Mark Twain Club (Charter Member)
  • Machinery and Technical Specialties International Committee 1995-Present

Publications

  • The Journal of the International Machinery & Technical Specialties Committee of the American Society of Appraisers “TUGBOAT DESIGN 101” Vol 13 No. 2 Fall 1996
  • The Journal of the International Machinery & Technical Specialties Committee of the American Society of Appraisers “KEEPING AN EYE ON YOUR MARINE ASSET” Vol 13 No. 3 Winter 1996
  • Marine Money, The Ship Finance Publication of Record “ASSET BASED APPRAISAL:, Vol. 21, No. 3, May/June 2006 Wrote the chapter on Marine Asset Appraisal for the American Society of Appraisers text book: “VALUING MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT: THE FUNDAMENTALS OF APPRAISING MACHINERY AND TECHNICAL ASSETS” Second Edition. In 2008, revised the chapter for the future Third Edition and wrote an accompanying Work Book section.

Email: nlaskay@dlsmarine.com

  

Harry Ward President DLS Marine

Harry Ward

President

Harry Ward is the President of Dufour, Laskay & Strouse, Inc. Harry is a US Navy veteran and has spent much of the past decade in the maritime industry in sales, finance and general management. He has extensive experience in asset and business valuation and is working to maintain DLS leadership in marine appraisal and survey for another 50 years. Harry is a graduate of the US Naval Academy and served as a helicopter pilot and survival instructor through multiple tours of duty. He has an MBA from San Diego State University.

Areas of Expertise:

  • Fleet and Vessel Appraisals
  • Marine Business Valuation
  • Transaction Support – Due Diligence
  • Transaction Support – Marine M&A Advisory
  • Digital Inspection – Marine and Offshore Wind

Education:

  • U. S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD – 1991, Bachelor of Science
  • San Diego State University, San Diego, CA – 1999, MBA with emphasis in Finance

Licenses and Professional Associations

  • FINRA Licenses, Series 63 and 79 (Investment Banking)
  • American Society of Appraisers, AM
  • Certified Exit Planning Advisor, CEPA (Business value assessment and strategy development