Skip to content
dls insights

Who’s In Charge Here?

“Give me an ultra-fast algorithm for I intend to go into harm’s way.”

 R.A. Ornelas
Ocean Master & Pilot Unlimited Gross Tonnage, Retired
 

AUTONOMOUS VESSELS and FLOATING WIND FARMS

As pointed out in past blogs, technology is advancing at a swift pace powered by ecological regulations and ESG investments; however, laws (particularly Admiralty laws) can’t advance at such a pace.

The state of maritime law as it pertains to these new areas of the marine industry is very important to lenders, lessors, and marine underwriters. What does the insurance policy cover and who is/are the beneficiaries? How can a lender protect their position? Here are some things to consider:

AUTONOMOUS VESSELS

There are various levels of autonomy and there doesn’t seem to be full agreement by interested parties on what they are.

Per Sea Machines, a U.S. technology company involved with autonomous vessel systems, Lloyds Register gives six levels of autonomy:

https://sea-machines.com/your-questions-about-marine-autonomy-answered/

The ship classification society Nippon Kaiji Kyokai (known as ClassNK) has ten levels:

Credit: ClassNK Technical Journal No. 4, 2021: Automation Levels of Automated/Autonomous Ships

As a work in progress, the IMO under the MSC group has been conducting a regulatory scoping exercise for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) and are presently thinking of establishing four levels of autonomy:

Credit: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/imo-msc-identifies-4-degrees-of-ship-automation/

Bureau Veritas has four levels of autonomy, ABS appears to have three (although they talk about a 4-step maturity level), and DNV has five.

For quite a while, underwriters will measure risk by attorney’s fees.

After sitting in on a webinar with a panel of international attorneys and legal academics, I learned about some of the problems that will be faced by owners, operators, insurers, and port state authorities. Some seem solvable in the short run but others, such as clearer regulations by IMO and maritime states/flag states and their port state authorities, can take years to enact and years of legal precedent to clarify.

Admittedly, most of these difficulties will arrive when autonomy reaches levels 3 and 4, and some of these may be worked out in the intervening years, but as with decisions on investing in what fuel, contracts, and policies are in place, the decisions have to be made before a ship even hits the water.

Thoughts…

  • Where there is vessel traffic control and/or lane separation, who do authorities contact when there is no one onboard?
  • What is the chain of command in case of an accident when there is no Master or crew to hold accountable? Flag state? Owner? The Management Company? The “driver” 2,000 miles away? Currently, authorities will often arrest the Master and possibly some crew members on scene. With autonomy, they no longer would have that leverage.
  • Who is the Master when the absentee operators work in 8-hour shifts? Just the one on watch at the time of the accident? What if a situation started on one shift and ran over into the next?
  • Some flag states have already stated they will not recognize autonomous ships. In others, their state definition of “ship” or “vessel” would prohibit MASS as the definitions often include mention of crew. This same definition problem arises, as any new international regulation covering MASS would have to span the differing definitions of “ship” and “vessel”.
  • Class societies do have some standards for onboard AI equipment and will have to be working towards more standardization of such equipment and their algorithms with the backing of IMO and authorities such as USCG.
  • Who will develop, certify, and inspect the shoreside operation?
  • The International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) provides operating crew standards, and port state authorities require specific crewing sizes. MASS vessels are not in accordance with either of these. They conflict with crew size requirements and put in question the requirement for a “proper lookout by sight and hearing”.
  • What should be the qualifications and training of the shoreside operator? Should they have a marine background or can one learn as with a digital game, i.e., simulators?
  • In the case of a pollution incident, will the vessel’s mandatory oil pollution coverage (required by many port states) cover MASS?
  • For port states to protect themselves from pollution or wreck removal, will ships be required to post a large bond before they can enter the port or even transit territorial waters?
  • What if the shore operator is in a country that is not an IMO maritime country and does not have to follow regulations? This might be like another form of Flags of Convenience (FOC).
  • What about the future of passenger ships without navigating crews? Will people feel safe on board? It is happening now, but typically on ferry boats that are never out of sight of land. Are cruise passengers ready to sit at the Captain’s Table with HAL 9000 or C-3PO? (probably).

Committees of ship operators, port state authorities, underwriter groups, lenders, naval architects, and shipbuilders, are all meeting to see how MASS fits into their future. Answers will be complex, elaborate, confusing, and a long time coming.

FLOATING WIND TURBINES

Floating wind turbines don’t have the legal entanglements that autonomous vessels have – yet.

Floaters (as floating wind turbines are referred to), are presently recognized as vessels for class purposes and fall under the same regulations as MODUs (Mobile Offshore Drilling Units) and FOFs (Floating Outer continental shelf Facilities). They will be subject to annual, interim, and the five-year special survey. A few specific parts, like tethers (the turbine anchoring system) will only be inspected every five years. As they are unmanned, they are not subject to regulations pertaining to crewing and safety and domestically, they do not need Coast Guard COI’s. If they are legally perceived as “vessels”, they are subject to being registered by their flag state and thereby subject to a maritime mortgage. This is presently in effect in Norway.

Floaters are being installed in deep water areas around the world. They may soon be used in New England, the U.S. west coast, and off the continental shelf in the Gulf of Mexico. Any domestic use may be a lift for GOM fabrication yards with their long experience in building offshore floating structures, anchor systems, and tethers.

One can see that an annual inspection of an offshore array of a 50-unit floating wind farm will be quite an undertaking. DLS Marine has been ahead of the curve, being the first independent marine survey company in the U.S. to be certified by ABS for the use of drones for remote inspections. Since then, we have continued our involvement through our affiliate company DroneUp, doing test drone inspections with Dominion Energy on their first Virginia offshore fixed turbines. We continue to work on software specially for drone turbine inspections and the production of digital reports of the inspections that will satisfy the needs of owners and regulatory bodies.

Legal entanglements regarding floating wind turbines are inevitable. Assuredly, there will be pressure applied by interested parties to alter the definition of a floater away from being classified the same as a vessel in areas where they are legally recognized as such. Also, lenders may start pushing back to maintain a straightforward means of loan security.

Other News

Choosing Fuels

Marine equipment of the future will have to be diversified. When it comes to traditional marine fuels, it has always been “one size fits all” with engines sized for the vessel, and while that is still true, now there is an additional challenge to accommodate the requirements for new fuels as well. Conveniently, LNG and Ammonia carriers can operate on the boil-off from their cargo, so the energy level of the fuel is not as important as with other vessels.

The power density of fuels now must fit the vessel’s service. A low power-to-weight fuel like hydrogen best fits short travel craft like ferries and other harbor vessels. They can refuel frequently through close fueling sites or swapping out tanks. This improves fuel efficiency by avoiding the need for large and heavy fuel tanks which add to overall weight. Power density is also a factor with large ocean service vessels. These vessels must sacrifice cargo capacity to accommodate the requirements of future fuels.

Aside from LNG, there is methanol which has a high power-to-weight ratio and is carried as a liquid. Rolls-Royce/MAN has developed methanol engines currently being installed on a large yacht. They state that there are 70 methanol engines on order. This is preliminary, with visions to produce larger engines for larger ships.

To be kept in mind, whatever fuel is being used in the main engines(s) should also work in the generators. Some of the new fuel engines are being perfected in smaller engines such as generators and have not had enough testing to justify the expense of building bigger engines for that fuel. This hurdle is somewhat avoided in diesel electric vessels.

Here is a reminder of the trade-offs with which owners are dealing:

This chart shows that, of the alternative fuels, LNG is the best in energy density. It is cleaner than traditional marine fuels and readily obtainable. This is despite the additional cost for LNG fuel storage and its required supply systems onboard ships. With world affairs affecting the market, the cost of LNG has made it less attractive. Methanol can be handled at closer to normal temperatures, but you need twice the amount. The same back and forth trade-offs fit all the fuels.

According to a new BV White Paper, here are the Well to Wake (WtW) pollution tradeoffs of marine fuels. Boardroom decisions aren’t getting easier.

Engine Innovation

In the past I have mentioned that while most of the environmental regulations are coming out of the Euro bloc and affect blue water shipping, domestic companies compete worldwide and must comply with these regulations to be competitive.  Among these, Cummins has three marine engines that are built to satisfy international regulations – The 1000-1500 HP QSK-38 Tier 4 is IMO III compliant, the 1400-2200 HP QSK-50 is IMO Tier II compliant, and the 2000-2700 HP QSK-60 is IMO III compliant.  Cummins also has hydrogen and hydrogen cell engines for industrial and trucking use. There will be some future adaptation for marine use in smaller vessels. Caterpillar’s large marine engines – the 3512E Tier 4 Final, 3516E Tier 4 Final, and the C32 Tier 4 Final are all IMO III. For now, it appears that their alternative fuel offerings are only for the generation of electricity.  Cat’s subsidiary, ProgressRail, produces the EMD E23 B 710 at 5000 HP which is IMO III.

Domestic engine innovation is in the lower horsepower engines and mainly for fixed power units and some over-the-road engines, whereas all large blue water engines are provided by foreign engine manufacturers. All manufacturers are facing decisions on where best to compete as there are 2-stroke and 4-stroke engines, high speed and low speed, and multiple fuels to run them. The builders of the large engines have gone to modular designs where the engine is standard but can be adapted to varying and dual fuels by “bolt on” injector and rail systems that can meter different fuels and controllable turbochargers. In addition, makers of lube oils have their own R&D to provide lubrication that stands up to the profiles of the different fuels.

Engine failures due to improper procedures in fuel changeovers have been expensive to operators and underwriters. This is another learning curve for the industry.

 

-Norman Laskay

If you’d like to keep this conversation going, please email me at nlaskay@DLSmarine.com

 

Footnote 1:

The quote at the head of this blog was spotted in the Comments section of an article that I read several years ago about autonomous vessels. It was such a great example of the dry humor I have heard from experienced mariners over the years that I had to add it to my interesting quotes file. If I ever meet Captain Ornelas, I would be glad to share my grog ration with him.

Footnote 2:

The cartoon is the product of Ms. Bonnie Taylor, ex Caterpillar Financial Services Nashville, ex customer and now friend. In her retirement she paints and answered my call to draw up a cartoon. Happily, we have a sample of her real work, a painting of a rural European village street, hanging in our house.

 

Follow Us for more like this:

Additional articles

What To Do About CO2

In many previous articles, I have written about the marine industry reacting to the CO2 emission reduction standards required for 2030, 2040, and the final Zero Emissions of 2050. These articles have been about the competition among alternate lower emission fuels (such as LNG and ammonia), changes in hull designs (to include rudders and propellors), improvements in dual-fuel engines, wind assist, and how all of these changes will be funded.

Read More »

Another Look at the Fuel Gauge

First, a look at the current leader, LNG. Even though the World Bank came out against LNG encouraging owners to skip LNG and concentrate on hydrogen-based fuels. We’ll get into hydrogen as a fuel later in this edition. The World Bank’s reasoning is that LNG is not that clean because of methane slip. Methane slip is not a term we hear too often

Read More »

BITS AND PIECES

With rapid technology changes and the endless flow of fascinating R&D press releases, some of the updates I wrote just three months ago are already old news. As one purpose of this blog is to help people not entirely in the maritime industry to keep up, here are some of the latest innovations (or proposed innovations) in maritime design and marketability

Read More »

Get A Quote

The Fastest Way To Get Your Project Started

DLS Marine Valuation Logo
Matt McDaniel DLS Marine Survey and Appraisal

Matt McDaniel

Hull & Machinery Surveyor

Areas of Expertise:

  • Hull and Machinery
  • Damage Assessment and Repairs
  • Condition
  • Inspections
  • Project Management

Memberships / Professional Certification:

  • NAMS-CMS

Background:

Matt began marine surveying in 2014 and has experience with damage causation, reviewing transit plans, new construction, cargo transfers, salvage operations, on/off charters, and general condition surveys. He joined the Hull & Machinery department at DLS in 2019.

mmcdaniel@dlsmarine.com
Jessie Page DLS Marine Survey and Appraisal

Jessie Page

Hull & Machinery Surveyor

Areas of Expertise:

  • Hull and Machinery
  • Diesel Technician
  • Marine Repair and Fabrication
  • Engine Causation Analysis
  • Equipment Damage
  • Vessel Conditions and Safety

Professional Certifications:

  • NAMS-CMS

Certified Specialist in Caterpillar diesel engines to include:

  • Small Engine Fuel Systems
  • Medium Engine Fuel Systems
  • Engine Diagnostics
  • Electronic Sensors and Control Logics
  • Electric and Electronic Troubleshooting
  • 3500 A/B/C Diesel Engine Master Mechanic I MUI/MEUI

Background:

Jessie joined DLS in 2021 with extensive experience in the marine industry. Jessie began his career as a shipfitter, machinist, and propulsion machinery installer at a shipyard. He then spent ten years as a diesel technician doing everything from routine mechanical repairs to complete engine overhauls and dynamometer testing. Jessie specializes in engine failure analysis and recognizing improper maintenance and installation. He is able to make recommendations regarding failure causation and potential imminent failures. Jessie transitioned to marine surveying in 2016 and is now a part of the DLS Hull & Machinery department.

jpage@dlsmarine.com

Ave P. Boudreaux

Marine Surveyor

Areas of Expertise:

  • Hull and Machinery
  • Project Management Supervisor (QC) – overseen numerous construction and delivery schedules for vessels
  • Extensive knowledge of U.S. Coast Guard and ABS rules and regulations for vessel construction and repair

Education:

  • Rolls-Royce Z-Drive Failure Analysis Seminar
  • Flex-Core and Aluminum Welding Course
  • Extensive training in engine, gear, and shaft alignment
  • Extensive training in vessel repair and new construction

Memberships / Professional Certification:

  • NAMS-CMS

Background:

Mr. Boudreaux has 15 years experience with offshore supply vessels, crewboats, and anchor handling tugs. During this time, he served 8 years in vessel repair and new construction, 3 years in vessel operation and logistics, and 4 years as a vessel port captain.

Mr. Boudreaux served over 3 years as a marine surveyor performing numerous types of surveys in the marine industry prior to joining DLS.

 aboudreaux@dlsmarine.com

Norm Laskay - DLS Marine Valuation

Norman F. Laskay

Of Counsel

Mr. Laskay joined Stickney, Dufour & Associates, Inc. in 1988 as a partner. He is now of Counsel. He became a Marine Surveyor in 1974, having gained prior experience in steamship agency, bulk cargo handling and vessel operations. He has been involved in many aspects of marine surveying including hull, machinery and cargo, both inland and ocean. Since becoming an Accredited Senior Appraiser of commercial marine equipment, he has been active with the American Society of Appraisers’ International Machinery and Technical Specialties Committee. He has written a comprehensive exam for the Commercial Marine Appraisal specialty and has written a 30-hour course for the American Society of Appraisers on appraising commercial marine vessels and yachts and is the lead instructor.

Areas of Expertise:

  • Commercial Marine Appraisal
  • Hull Damage and Repair
  • Cargo Loading, Securing and Trip in Tow Preparation

Education:

  • Maine Maritime Academy Graduate
    B.S. in Marine Transportation
  • Continuing education credits in Law, Appraisal, Marine Survey, and Diesel Repair.

Professional Certification/Memberships:

  • NAMS Regional Board of Directors Member 1989-1994
  • American Society of Appraisers – Chapter Treasurer 1991-1994
  • American Society of Appraisers – Chapter President 1994-1995
  • Mark Twain Club (Charter Member)
  • Machinery and Technical Specialties International Committee 1995-Present

Publications

  • The Journal of the International Machinery & Technical Specialties Committee of the American Society of Appraisers “TUGBOAT DESIGN 101” Vol 13 No. 2 Fall 1996
  • The Journal of the International Machinery & Technical Specialties Committee of the American Society of Appraisers “KEEPING AN EYE ON YOUR MARINE ASSET” Vol 13 No. 3 Winter 1996
  • Marine Money, The Ship Finance Publication of Record “ASSET BASED APPRAISAL:, Vol. 21, No. 3, May/June 2006 Wrote the chapter on Marine Asset Appraisal for the American Society of Appraisers text book: “VALUING MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT: THE FUNDAMENTALS OF APPRAISING MACHINERY AND TECHNICAL ASSETS” Second Edition. In 2008, revised the chapter for the future Third Edition and wrote an accompanying Work Book section.

Email: nlaskay@dlsmarine.com

  

Harry Ward President DLS Marine

Harry Ward

President

Harry Ward is the President of Dufour, Laskay & Strouse, Inc. Harry is a US Navy veteran and has spent much of the past decade in the maritime industry in sales, finance and general management. He has extensive experience in asset and business valuation and is working to maintain DLS leadership in marine appraisal and survey for another 50 years. Harry is a graduate of the US Naval Academy and served as a helicopter pilot and survival instructor through multiple tours of duty. He has an MBA from San Diego State University.

Areas of Expertise:

  • Fleet and Vessel Appraisals
  • Marine Business Valuation
  • Transaction Support – Due Diligence
  • Transaction Support – Marine M&A Advisory
  • Digital Inspection – Marine and Offshore Wind

Education:

  • U. S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD – 1991, Bachelor of Science
  • San Diego State University, San Diego, CA – 1999, MBA with emphasis in Finance

Licenses and Professional Associations

  • FINRA Licenses, Series 63 and 79 (Investment Banking)
  • American Society of Appraisers, AM
  • Certified Exit Planning Advisor, CEPA (Business value assessment and strategy development